| 1 |
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 12:02:41PM +0200, Luis Ressel wrote: |
| 2 |
> our portage policy includes a portage_ro_role interface to allow |
| 3 |
> read-only access to portage data. As usual with _role interfaces, |
| 4 |
> according to the documentation the interface takes a role as the first |
| 5 |
> ($1) and a type as the second argument ($2). However, the directives |
| 6 |
> in the interface actually expect $1 to be a type. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> So, we should either |
| 9 |
> 1) replace $1 with $2 inside the interface, or |
| 10 |
> 2) rename the interface to something without _role and fix the |
| 11 |
> documentation. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
My suggestion is to go with 1 - fix the use of the $1 and $2 parameters. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Wkr, |
| 16 |
Sven Vermeulen |
Archives