| 1 |
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 02:36, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 2 |
> Michael & List |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> First I'd like to say thank you for your ebuild submissions to the |
| 5 |
> ugzilla system. But I have to mention that while live CVS ebuilds are |
| 6 |
> very nice for developers/or the bleeding edge its pretty much |
| 7 |
> discourraged around here for a developer to introduce new live cvs |
| 8 |
> ebuilds unless its has a static ebuild counterpart to go along with |
| 9 |
> them. This is needed so the package can hopefully reach "stable" status |
| 10 |
> in portage eg: not ~arch |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> If however your willing to work with us on this and make static ebuilds |
| 13 |
> with versions that have digestable md5sums then I'd be happy to work |
| 14 |
> with you on getting these ebuilds commited to portage on your behalf, or |
| 15 |
> atleast the ones that are not assinged to another dev already. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Sure thing. I'll whip up some ebuilds in a few hours. Should I append |
| 18 |
them to the same bugs that are already open or create new bugs for them? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Best regards |
| 21 |
Michael Boman |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Michael Boman |
| 25 |
Security Architect, SecureCiRT Pte Ltd |
| 26 |
http://www.securecirt.com |
Archives