| 1 |
Isn't it miserable to see, that as time is passing by, more and more |
| 2 |
important softwares (java, python, libreoffice, firefox) conflict with |
| 3 |
more and more PAX restrictions? |
| 4 |
I would expect exactly the opposite. But it seems, that developers become |
| 5 |
less and less aware (or care less) about security. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Nowdays I would rather run libreoffice and firefox in a jail. But I have |
| 8 |
no time to set up an environment and grsec policy for it. |
| 9 |
-- |
| 10 |
dr Tóth Attila, Radiológus, 06-20-825-8057 |
| 11 |
Attila Toth MD, Radiologist, +36-20-825-8057 |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
2011.December 31.(Szo) 13:05 időpontban pageexec@××××××××.hu ezt írta: |
| 14 |
> On 30 Dec 2011 at 13:28, Sven Vermeulen wrote: |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
>> Regarding the firefox issue, I don't know if a bug is already opened for |
| 17 |
>> that, but the solution is to paxmark -r (disable RANDMMAP) both |
| 18 |
>> xpcshell |
| 19 |
>> (you'll need to edit the ebuild to do so or do it before it starts in |
| 20 |
>> the |
| 21 |
>> install phase) and the resulting firefox binary (on the system). |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> no, that's pretty much never a solution ;), better fix the bug, see |
| 24 |
> bugzilla. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
Archives