Archives
Archives
| From: | Pavel Labushev <p.labushev@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-hardened@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] "How hard" is Linux kernel-side hardening? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 22 Sep 2009 02:31:43 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4AB8362D.7080201@gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] "How hard" is Linux kernel-side hardening? by "Javier J. Martínez Cabezón" |
||
| 1 | Javier J. Martínez Cabezón пишет: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > RSBAC with PaX works with new kernels, you can patch it yourself or |
| 4 | > you can download one kernel that is already patched from |
| 5 | > http://enhanced.rsbac.org/2.6/2.6.31/. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | I'm sorry for that wrong assumption. Last time I checked there were no |
| 8 | recent kernel pathes with PaX in http://enhanced.rsbac.org/2.6/. The |
| 9 | fact RSBAC is working with PaX makes it really interesting, thanks. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Are there any plans to support RSBAC+PaX kernels? |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-hardened] "How hard" is Linux kernel-side hardening? | klondike <franxisco1988@×××××.com> |