| 1 |
On 07/07/2013 08:15 PM, Alex Efros wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi! |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 01:34:07AM +0200, "Tóth Attila" wrote: |
| 5 |
>> I have a feeling some system settings are wrong. These things happen the |
| 6 |
>> same way on my laptop and the server. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I'm too sleepy now and may misunderstood your issue, but at glance: |
| 9 |
> 1) don't enable both PT and XT in kernel, choose only one (XT) |
| 10 |
> 2) https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465000 may be actual for you, |
| 11 |
> maybe you should try >=portage-2.1.12.9 (~ARCH now) |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
>=portage-2.1.12.9 contains an install wrapper I wrote which preserves |
| 15 |
xattr pax markings no matter where they are in the ebuild (before or |
| 16 |
after install). While it is possible for ebuilds to do something crazy |
| 17 |
like using cp instead of install and circumvent this (these should be |
| 18 |
fixed anyhow), this bug should now be fixed. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
@Toth. Please enable either PAX_PT_PAX_FLAGS or PAX_XATTR_PAX_FLAGS in |
| 21 |
your kernel, not both. It is problematic to set both. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
In your make.conf set PAX_MARKINGS="PT" in the former case or |
| 24 |
PAX_MARKINGS="XT". It is safe to set both: PAX_MARKINGS="PT XT" |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
On my system, I have "PAX_PT_PAX_FLAGS not set", PAX_XATTR_PAX_FLAGS=y |
| 27 |
in my kernel, PAX_MARKINGS="PT XT" in my make.conf and I am using |
| 28 |
>=portage-2.1.12.9. So far everything works. Markings get where they |
| 29 |
are supposed to go and all the usual problematic packages work. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Anthony G. Basile, Ph. D. |
| 34 |
Chair of Information Technology |
| 35 |
D'Youville College |
| 36 |
Buffalo, NY 14201 |
| 37 |
(716) 829-8197 |
Archives