Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From: Maxim Kammerer <mk@×××.su>
To: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] hardened-sources-3.2.11 + i965 + x.org: possible regression
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 15:02:26
Message-Id: CAHsXYDBWP9x9MW+U0mijMUZOh_zX=_NAH687Tc_0H42Nk_aKeQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-hardened] hardened-sources-3.2.11 + i965 + x.org: possible regression by "Anthony G. Basile"
1 On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Anthony G. Basile
2 <basile@××××××××××××××.edu> wrote:
3 > Liberte, last I looked, has quite a few hardening features off.
4
5 True — this is made necessary by having to support virtualized
6 environments (and, of course, Xorg, wrt. GRKERNSEC_IO). Since out last
7 discussion on the subject, I have “discovered” the
8 GRKERNSEC_HARDENED_VIRTUALIZATION profile, which fits quite well the
9 settings that were carefully selected previously.
10
11 By the way, Liberté also mounts /dev with noexec, and I received no
12 complaints so far (see bug #92921). I also grepped the driver sources
13 before making the change, and didn't find any attempts to map /dev/mem
14 with PROT_EXEC. No idea if the noexec issue is still present with
15 proprietary drivers, though.
16
17 --
18 Maxim Kammerer
19 Liberté Linux (discussion / support: http://dee.su/liberte-contribute)

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-hardened] hardened-sources-3.2.11 + i965 + x.org: possible regression "Tóth Attila" <atoth@××××××××××.hu>