| 1 |
On 23/11/16 15:58, Jason Zaman wrote: |
| 2 |
> Either is fine, but im probably just gonna stabilize the 2.6 userspace |
| 3 |
> in a couple weeks so that one is likely easier. and setools4 is waaay |
| 4 |
> better than 3. The important point is that you dont want to have both |
| 5 |
> policy.29 and policy.30 around. Then you get weirdness like if you |
| 6 |
> downgrade a kernel or something random it'll load in the old policy |
| 7 |
> which probably doesnt work properly, so whichever you pick, make sure |
| 8 |
> you nuke the other one. and semodule -B will rebuild the whole policy |
| 9 |
> again and load it. |
| 10 |
OK - I will go with policy.30 and add the keywords etc. I did a couple |
| 11 |
of local policy changes that may not be needed so will they disappear in |
| 12 |
all of this or do I need to remove them somehow first? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Thanks for all your help, |
| 15 |
Robert |
Archives