Archives
Archives
| From: | "Aaron W. Swenson" <titanofold@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-hardened@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] Official project position on grsecurity change in release policy? | ||
| Date: | Fri, 12 May 2017 13:45:57 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20170512134550.GB28243@gengoff.gsmr1.local | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-hardened] Official project position on grsecurity change in release policy? by "Max R.D. Parmer" |
||
| 1 | On 2017-05-11 09:31, Max R.D. Parmer wrote: |
| 2 | > Howdy, |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > Perhaps I missed it, but I've been so far unable to find a position/plan |
| 5 | > for the future of hardened-sources from the Gentoo Hardened project |
| 6 | > members. I've searched the site and mailing list archives. Has any such |
| 7 | > statement been made? |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > I see there are some efforts to create a community maintained version of |
| 10 | > the PaX/Grsecurity patchset[1][2], this seems to be a likely forward |
| 11 | > course, but is integrating it the plan of the Hardened project or does |
| 12 | > that remain to be seen? |
| 13 | > |
| 14 | > |
| 15 | > [1]: https://github.com/thestinger/linux-hardened |
| 16 | > [2]: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Hardened_Kernel |
| 17 | > |
| 18 | > Thanks for any additional insight you might provide, |
| 19 | > Max |
| 20 | |
| 21 | There’s been discussion on it, but I don’t know if we have come to a |
| 22 | decision. |
| 23 | |
| 24 | https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-hardened/threads/2017-05/ |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-hardened] Official project position on grsecurity change in release policy? | Sven Vermeulen <swift@g.o> |