Re: [gentoo-hardened] [PATCH] fix sys-process/cronie compilation under gentoo+musl

[daggs]

Greetings,

> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 at 11:05 PM
> From: "Tóth Attila" <atoth@××××××××××.hu>
> To: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] [PATCH] fix sys-process/cronie compilation under gentoo+musl
>
> It's hard to spot the missing define in your patch, which includes a
> complete list of files of a whole package. Most of the material is
> consumed by the Changelog, tl;dr.
>
> Do you mean these two?
>
> +#include <limits.h>
>
> +/* match gnu to posix */
> +#define MAXNAMLEN NAME_MAX
>
> I would suggest to attach the responsible patch of the missing define only
> and the necessary diff of a given ebuild file. That two files could be
> enough, I guess.
>
> The same suggestions goes for the previous offer.
>
so the right way to do this is to add the fix patch, a patch that modifies an existing ebuild and if the ebuild is not present in the musl branch I should mentioned that?