| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
The message on gentoo-core caught me a bit by surprise. Will anaconda be the |
| 4 |
default gentoo installer? What about the GLIS project? Isn't anaconda a bit |
| 5 |
against the "Choices" that Gentoo tries to sell? It first of doesn't allow |
| 6 |
stage1/stage2 installs, and I don't know what other choices the user can't |
| 7 |
make anymore. Is Anaconda really a best option here? Will it be available for |
| 8 |
all architectures? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
A second PoV is documentation-wise: having an Anaconda-installation needs a |
| 11 |
whole new documentation. We can't use the existing knowledge as it all |
| 12 |
happens behind the curtains. We can't integrate it with the current efforts |
| 13 |
to centralise all documentation in the Gentoo Handbook as the "Installing |
| 14 |
Gentoo" chapters works from command-line PoV. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
What I really wanted to ask here: can I make public (on gentoo-doc) that |
| 17 |
Gentoo is going to use an Anaconda-installer? It is very important that the |
| 18 |
documentation team is informed about this (major) change and that new editors |
| 19 |
are searched, and this with a sufficient timeframe, so that the |
| 20 |
anaconda-related documentation and -changes are finished in time. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Wkr, |
| 23 |
Sven Vermeulen |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
^__^ And Larry saw that it was Good. |
| 27 |
(oo) Sven Vermeulen |
| 28 |
(__) http://www.gentoo.org Gentoo Documentation Project |
Archives