| 1 |
Okay, i'll report later since the machine in question is kind of slow... |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Will you want my .config file? |
| 4 |
and yes, its on x86. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
btw, I also have a powerpc, how is the status of pax on ppc? |
| 7 |
- performance issues |
| 8 |
- should non-executable pages or segments be prefered? |
| 9 |
- aslr status.. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
pax on ppc64, does it use non-exec pages bit? there is hw support.. |
| 12 |
just like the in the amd64. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
TIA.. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 21:02:03 +0100, pageexec@××××××××.hu |
| 17 |
<pageexec@××××××××.hu> wrote: |
| 18 |
> > I've built a gentoo-dev-hardened2.6.7-r10 with pax enabled, but boot hangs with: |
| 19 |
> > - |
| 20 |
> > init: must be superuser |
| 21 |
> > Kernel Panic Attempted To Kill Init |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> can you try with the plain PaX patch (and same .config) and see if |
| 24 |
> you still get this? it's quite weird because PaX doesn't play with |
| 25 |
> the uid ;-). |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Miguel Sousa Filipe |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |
Archives