Archives
Archives
| From: | Alejo Sanchez <alejos@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-hardened@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] GOT protection | ||
| Date: | Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:27:16 | ||
| Message-Id: | 3190d0e50610170825u7b5c8074n4f8d12faad39771@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] GOT protection by Javier Barrio |
||
| 1 | On 10/17/06, Javier Barrio <coder@×××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > > Now to the question. I was wondering if there is a way to protect GOT |
| 4 | > > (besides having ET_DYN) in the way OpenBSD does |
| 5 | > > (http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20030126143902). If not, |
| 6 | > > what would you think on a similar patch for Hardened? |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > Mmm, I think that can be (partially) protected passing -z relro to the |
| 9 | > gnu linker, making RELRO segment read-only after symbol resolution. |
| 10 | > |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Thanks!Tried googling but didn't get there. Should've tried harder, perhaps. |
| 13 | http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/hardened/hardened-toolchain.xml#doc_chap4 |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Cheers. |
| 16 | |
| 17 | Alejo |
| 18 | -- |
| 19 | gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-hardened] Re: GOT protection | 7v5w7go9ub0o <7v5w7go9ub0o@×××××.com> |