Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From: "Paweł Hajdan
To: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-hardened] SELinux policy updates in hardened-dev overlay
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 18:04:10
Message-Id: 50955848.5050507@gentoo.org
1 On 11/3/12 10:33 AM, bugzilla-daemon@g.o wrote:
2 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436474
3 >
4 > Sven Vermeulen changed:
5 >
6 > What |Removed |Added
7 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 > Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED
9 > Resolution|--- |TEST-REQUEST
10 >
11 > --- Comment #11 from Sven Vermeulen ---
12 > In hardened-dev, r6 release
13
14 Thank you for getting things fixed! I appreciate that.
15
16 One note though: why not push policy fixes to main tree, ~arch or hard
17 masked? See Diego's post
18 <http://blog.flameeyes.eu/2010/08/fixed-in-overlay-read-not-fixed> - and
19 I agree with most of it.
20
21 Note that when you change eclasses or toolchain, it makes sense to test
22 in an isolated overlay. But when the in-tree policy for chromium is
23 unusable anyway, why not just push a new version there?
24
25 Paweł

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies