1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
So... yes. X needs direct (privileged) access to video hardware (and |
6 |
hence DRI). |
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
brant williams |
10 |
FCAA CDCA 20BC 3925 D634 F5C4 7420 6784 4DEB 6002 |
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, Christian Heim wrote: |
15 |
|
16 |
> Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 01:53:25 +0000 |
17 |
> From: Christian Heim <phreak@g.o> |
18 |
> Reply-To: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o |
19 |
> To: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o |
20 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] grSecurity warnings about XFree86; Xorg also |
21 |
> targeted? |
22 |
> |
23 |
> On 24/12/07 20:15 -0500, Ren? Rh?aume wrote: |
24 |
>> Some grSecurity features have a clear warning they break XFree86 |
25 |
>> (disable privileged IO, for example). Do those warnings apply to |
26 |
>> modular Xorg too, as they were not updated for the last three years? |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Well Xorg still is XFree86, just named differntly. Just noone deemed it |
29 |
> necessary to change the comment with that regard, as most people know |
30 |
> Xorg == XFree86 .. |
31 |
> -- |
32 |
> gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |
33 |
> |
34 |
> |
35 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
36 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) |
37 |
|
38 |
iD8DBQFHcHe5dCBnhE3rYAIRCBqQAKCg6IPSzxWW1HGaSar7R6RLxjEkZwCfeEuW |
39 |
3a5FPG+pYhrST7uERxgoW4M= |
40 |
=2J3W |
41 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
42 |
-- |
43 |
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |