Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From: brant williams <brant@×××××.net>
To: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] grSecurity warnings about XFree86; Xorg also targeted?
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 03:25:48
Message-Id: Pine.LNX.4.64.0712242122250.30478@nerv.tnarb.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-hardened] grSecurity warnings about XFree86; Xorg also targeted? by Christian Heim
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA256
3
4
5 So... yes. X needs direct (privileged) access to video hardware (and
6 hence DRI).
7
8
9 brant williams
10 FCAA CDCA 20BC 3925 D634 F5C4 7420 6784 4DEB 6002
11
12
13
14 On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, Christian Heim wrote:
15
16 > Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 01:53:25 +0000
17 > From: Christian Heim <phreak@g.o>
18 > Reply-To: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o
19 > To: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o
20 > Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] grSecurity warnings about XFree86; Xorg also
21 > targeted?
22 >
23 > On 24/12/07 20:15 -0500, Ren? Rh?aume wrote:
24 >> Some grSecurity features have a clear warning they break XFree86
25 >> (disable privileged IO, for example). Do those warnings apply to
26 >> modular Xorg too, as they were not updated for the last three years?
27 >
28 > Well Xorg still is XFree86, just named differntly. Just noone deemed it
29 > necessary to change the comment with that regard, as most people know
30 > Xorg == XFree86 ..
31 > --
32 > gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list
33 >
34 >
35 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
36 Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
37
38 iD8DBQFHcHe5dCBnhE3rYAIRCBqQAKCg6IPSzxWW1HGaSar7R6RLxjEkZwCfeEuW
39 3a5FPG+pYhrST7uERxgoW4M=
40 =2J3W
41 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
42 --
43 gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list