| 1 |
2017.Május 2.(K) 18:59 időpontban Daniel Cegiełka ezt írta: |
| 2 |
>> pax.?mark actually, since the eclass helper is called pax-mark. :) |
| 3 |
>> I'd hold off on removing those for at least a few months, though. |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> If PAX_MPROTECT returns (KSPP?), then ebuilds will need to be |
| 7 |
> 'paxmarked' again. Years of work and PaX support ends in the trash. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I must aggree here. If there will be an alternative implementation marking |
| 10 |
may regain its meaning. The same binaries need to be marked in some way or |
| 11 |
another. I wouldn't simply dump it unless it would disturb some |
| 12 |
functionality. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Regards: Dw. |
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
dr Tóth Attila, Radiológus, 06-20-825-8057 |
| 17 |
Attila Toth MD, Radiologist, +36-20-825-8057 |
Archives