1 |
On 05/11/2007, Michael Sandee <sandee@××××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> Well on x86_64 you dont have much of the kernexec ;) |
3 |
> |
4 |
> But I am pretty sure removing the code from head.S which I pasted (line |
5 |
> 61 till 64) will work around the bug while still keeping the effective |
6 |
> parts of kernexec. This specific part of kernexec is not extremely |
7 |
> effective anyway. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> + it would help us pinpoint the issue :) |
10 |
|
11 |
Actually upon checking with a kernel that has no kernexec, same error. |
12 |
-- |
13 |
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |