| 1 |
Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>On Sat, 2004-12-04 at 11:42, Mark R. Martinez wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>>Is anyone working on any aspect of SAL (Secure Auditing)? |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
>A sub project within gentoo-security team has begun work on general |
| 11 |
>source code auditing. |
| 12 |
>http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/security/audit.xml |
| 13 |
>mail krispykringle@g.o for more details on getting involved. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
I think solar misunderstood.. This isn't code auditing, this is kernel |
| 19 |
event auditing.. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
the answer is, SAL won't be supported anytime soon I suspect, not only |
| 22 |
does it have issues me nor anyone else will be dealing with another |
| 23 |
auditing framework was merged into mainline. Any official support for |
| 24 |
auditing will almost certainly use this framework. Unfortunatly the |
| 25 |
infrastructure for it really sucks right now, what infrastructure exists |
| 26 |
that is. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
I've been speaking with the person who took over development of the |
| 29 |
framework and there will be extensive development very soon so stay tuned.. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Joshua Brindle |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |
Archives