Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From: "Anthony G. Basile" <basile@××××××××××××××.edu>
To: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] Progress towards XATTR_PAX in Gentoo.
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 06:02:23
Message-Id: 50D681E1.7050508@opensource.dyc.edu
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-hardened] Progress towards XATTR_PAX in Gentoo. by Maxim Kammerer
1 On 12/22/2012 05:58 PM, Maxim Kammerer wrote:
2 > Hi Anthony,
3 >
4 > Is user.* xattrs on tmpfs considered safe now? (Referring to
5 > meeting-2012-11-14_20_00UTC.log.)
6 >
7 > As a side note, why does XATTR_PAX use user.* and not security.* namespace?
8 >
9
10 An updated patch by pipacs limits tmpfs to just user.pax.* namespace,
11 and even then there is a size limit. The size check is critical and
12 what was originally missing.
13
14 XATTR_PAX uses user.* so that a non-privileged user can set flags on
15 their own ELF objects as they can with PT_PAX. Primarily the concern is
16 on processes running as root. There PaX hedges against escalation.
17 There is no danger of escalation when it comes to processes that below
18 to a low privileged user.
19
20 --
21 Anthony G. Basile, Ph. D.
22 Chair of Information Technology
23 D'Youville College
24 Buffalo, NY 14201
25 (716) 829-8197