Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From: Wolfram Schlich <lists@×××××××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] PAX: suspicious general protection fault
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 00:39:02
Message-Id: 20071205003648.GI7508@bla.fasel.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-hardened] PAX: suspicious general protection fault by pageexec@freemail.hu
1 * pageexec@××××××××.hu <pageexec@××××××××.hu> [2007-12-03 18:16]:
2 > On 3 Dec 2007 at 18:47, Petteri Räty wrote:
3 >
4 > > Well I go with whatever is marked stable and atm it's .22. Will send the
5 > > System.map in private.
6 >
7 > thanks for the info, the bug occured in find_get_page because
8 > radix_tree_lookup returned '1' instead of a NULL or valid ptr.
9 > how that is possible i have no idea, if you can reproduce the
10 > bug then it's time to call in the real kernel devs i think ;).
11
12 Do you remember https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197521 ?! :)
13 --
14 Regards,
15 Wolfram Schlich <wschlich@g.o>
16 Gentoo Linux * http://dev.gentoo.org/~wschlich/
17 --
18 gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-hardened] PAX: suspicious general protection fault pageexec@××××××××.hu