Re: [gentoo-hardened] hardened_gcc_glibc2.3.3_nptl_headers2.6_bug53616

[Ned Ludd]

On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 13:55, Dennis Freise wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 20:47:55 +0300
> Rumen Yotov <rumen_yotov@×××.bg> wrote:
>
> > > That's a dupe of #52254. Look over there. Patch is there, I tested it and it
> > > compiles fine, but it's not yet in portage on any not-masked ebuilds. If you
> > > want a hardened-gcc + glibc/nptl I would recommend waiting a little longer
> > > until that patch gets applied to glibc-2.3.3.20040420, or any newer glibc
> > > gets unmasked.
> > >
> > Using all ~x86 system.
> > At the moment did 'emerge glibc-2.3.3-20040420 -f' and it also fetched:
> > glibc-2.3.3-branch-update-20040420.patch.bz2 (already had:
> > glibc-linuxthreads-2.3.2.tar.bz2). But i'll wait not in a hurry ;-)
>
> That branch-update is the reason why it's called glibc-*2.3.3-20040420* :-)
> Nothing new in that update, it was always there. In my portage (synced this am
> @ 3:25) the glibc-ebuild didn't contain the hardened-sysdep-shared patch, so it
> won't compile with USE="hardened nptl". You could apply that patch yourself
> though...
>
> > > > Still no solution for mysql-4.0.20?
> > >
> > > What do you mean ? I compiled mysql-4.0.20 with a hardened-gcc just
> > > yesterday - no problems.
> > I mean that in BUG-53616 mysql-4.0.20 is also pointed as blocker for
> > this bug.
>
> Well, for your convinience, I just tried it again, using hardened-gcc -3.3.3-r6,
> glibc/+nptl and linux-headers-2.6.6 - it compiled fine. I can't confirm that
> bug.


Just a note for everybody.. 
That patch will not be added till a few people confirm it solves the
problem for them on that bug (ie not mailing lists).

-- 
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
Gentoo (hardened,security,infrastructure,embedded,toolchain) Developer