| 1 |
I am using 4.4.4-r1 from tree and have been for about a month. I thing |
| 2 |
there is something in binutils holding it back but Zorry would know more. |
| 3 |
This is on AMD64. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 17:47, Mike Williams <mike@×××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> Hey guys, |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I need to upgrade a bunch of packages shortly, which means taking a new |
| 10 |
> snapshot of the tree. |
| 11 |
> From the log of the last meeting gcc-4.4.3-r3 is coming and it'd be nice to |
| 12 |
> get that upgrade in with all the others. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Is it expected 4.4.3-r3 will go stable soon, or is it considered stable |
| 15 |
> enough |
| 16 |
> for real use now? |
| 17 |
> If it isn't, does 4.4.3-r2 from the main tree have full SSP support? I'm |
| 18 |
> running 4.4.2-r2 that came from the hardened-development overlay, and |
| 19 |
> wouldn't |
| 20 |
> want less features. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Thanks |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> -- |
| 25 |
> Mike Williams |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> |
Archives