Archives
Archives
| From: | "Bánszki Gábor" <banszki.gabor@××××××.hu> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-hardened@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] PaX and the availability of the NX bit on a CPU | ||
| Date: | Fri, 09 Jun 2006 18:09:34 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1149876327.13176.9.camel@localhost | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-hardened] PaX and the availability of the NX bit on a CPU by Pedro Venda |
||
| 1 | Hi Pedro! |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | I don't have experiences with NX bit, but I think that your directive |
| 5 | below is not consistent with NX bit of P4 architecture...... |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | > I've compiled the kernel for pentium3 and built the system |
| 9 | > with -march=pentium3. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | By the way.... Use the latest Vanilla kernel with apropriate patches, |
| 12 | and build it for P4 based architecture! |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Could you please inform me about the results? I am interested in. |
| 15 | |
| 16 | Regards, |
| 17 | |
| 18 | Gábor Bánszki |