Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From: Rumen Yotov <rumen@××××××.org>
To: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] hardened vs gentoo sources.
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 05:15:03
Message-Id: 20070317071437.02896aa9@rumen.qrypto.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-hardened] hardened vs gentoo sources. by Caleb Cushing
1 On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:54:16 -0400
2 "Caleb Cushing" <xenoterracide@×××××.com> wrote:
3
4 > are there any real advantages to using hardened sources if you aren't
5 > applying any pax or grsecurity patches? given that you can get
6 > selinux in regular gentoo sources.
7 Hi,
8 Current hardening scheme is broadly said in two places:
9 1.kernel patches - PaX, grsec2, rsbac(incl. PaX), selinux;
10 2.Building all userland apps "PIC&PIE" (SSP is already in gcc-4.1.X).
11 PaX complements PIE very well, all the others are access-control tools.
12 Very simplified explanation, here.
13 HTH. Rumen
14 --
15 gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list