1 |
On Jan 14, 2012 9:24 PM, Tóth Attila <atoth@××××××××××.hu> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> I have two hardened gentoo systems I'm running for many years now. I've |
4 |
> installed the personal server in 2004. The laptop started in 2005. Now the |
5 |
> time has come, to change to 64bit. I can't circumwent it. You know it |
6 |
> means I'm rolling these systems for many years without the need to |
7 |
> reinstall! The server would just go to primary school now as a human |
8 |
> being... I must say: hardened rocks! |
9 |
> |
10 |
> First I'll perform an install for the laptop. Later I'll go on with the |
11 |
> server, when it'll get upgraded... |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I see some hardened stage3s from 2011 June on the mirrors. Should I start |
14 |
> with them or rather convert a normal install? Are there any more recent |
15 |
> hardened stages available online? |
16 |
|
17 |
There are; you can find them at http://www.jmbsvicetto.name |
18 |
|
19 |
> I will run a proprietary Linux software, which is still a 32bit binary. |
20 |
> The software is statically linked, so it needs no other libraries at all. |
21 |
> All other softwares I plan to run are 64bit (including libreoffice and |
22 |
> firefox). What would you suggest? May I aim for a no-multilib install? |
23 |
> Should I still go for regular multilib setup? Is it enough to enable 32bit |
24 |
> compatibility for the kernel and let the whole system be 64bit otherwise? |
25 |
> Are there any known serious obstacles with no-multilib? |
26 |
|
27 |
Are you certain that *all* binaries offered are statically linked? It |
28 |
wouldn't hurt to start out with a no-multilib and see if it indeed works. |
29 |
Otherwise you'll never know ;-) |
30 |
|
31 |
Wkr, |
32 |
Sven Vermeulen |