Archives
Archives
| From: | Luis Ressel <aranea@×××××.de> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-hardened@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] Help testing full end-to-end xattr support in portage | ||
| Date: | Thu, 26 Jun 2014 22:18:05 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20140627001737.42eccdb4@gentp.lnet | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-hardened] Help testing full end-to-end xattr support in portage by "Anthony G. Basile" |
||
| 1 | My kernel has been XT-only for ages now, so no change required here. I |
| 2 | installed install-xattr and applied the portage patch. So far I've |
| 3 | reemerged python:2.7 - it worked fine and the duration was much more |
| 4 | bearable than with the python-based install wrapper (down from 8 |
| 5 | minutes to 4 minutes, but still worse than the ~2 minutes in the good |
| 6 | ol' days with vanilla install). I'll test more ebuilds in the next days. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | PS: I wonder if sys-apps/paxctl could be removed from the @system set |
| 9 | now, as it's obsolete and superseded by elfix. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Regards, |
| 13 | Luis Ressel |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-hardened] Help testing full end-to-end xattr support in portage | "Anthony G. Basile" <basile@××××××××××××××.edu> |