Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From: "Tóth Attila" <atoth@××××××××××.hu>
To: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] Technical repercussions of grsecurity removal
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 19:10:58
Message-Id: 708eb0ac0669097fd9db4a0889a222ad.squirrel@atoth.sote.hu
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-hardened] Technical repercussions of grsecurity removal by Andrew Savchenko
1 2017.Május 8.(H) 23:12 időpontban Andrew Savchenko ezt írta:
2 > Most likely KSPP project will come up, they are doing a good job:
3 > bringing security features upstream fixing bugs in PaX code during
4 > the process [1]. This is what PaX should have done long time ago,
5 > they were even offered CII grant for this job, but refused [2].
6 >
7 > [1] http://openwall.com/lists/kernel-hardening/2017/05/02/4
8 > [2]
9 > https://lists.coreinfrastructure.org/pipermail/cii-discuss/2015-August/000003.html
10
11 Just as a follow-up regarding the argument between KSPP and Grsecurity.
12 Please take a look at on the reply of PaxTeam postend on the openwall
13 mailing list:
14 http://openwall.com/lists/kernel-hardening/2017/05/11/2
15
16 Pá:
17 Attila
18 --
19 dr Tóth Attila, Radiológus, 06-20-825-8057
20 Attila Toth MD, Radiologist, +36-20-825-8057

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-hardened] Technical repercussions of grsecurity removal Alex Efros <powerman@××××××××.name>