Archives
Archives
| From: | "René Rhéaume" <rene.rheaume@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-hardened@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] hardened vs gentoo sources. | ||
| Date: | Mon, 19 Mar 2007 21:49:55 | ||
| Message-Id: | 35572ca80703191447i1ea1b0eey2ea52c4a11eb41f1@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-hardened] hardened vs gentoo sources. by Caleb Cushing |
||
| 1 | On 3/16/07, Caleb Cushing <xenoterracide@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 | > are there any real advantages to using hardened sources if you aren't |
| 3 | > applying any pax or grsecurity patches? given that you can get selinux in |
| 4 | > regular gentoo sources. |
| 5 | I have a related question. Why hardened-sources does not use the base |
| 6 | genpatches? |
| 7 | -- |
| 8 | gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-hardened] hardened vs gentoo sources. | Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |