| 1 |
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 07:41:37AM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi Sven, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Did you identify what the wierdness was. I'd like to eventually clean |
| 5 |
> up the profiles. Rather than |
| 6 |
[...] |
| 7 |
> I'd like the selinux to conform to the hardened/linux/amd64, ie change |
| 8 |
> 10-16 to just |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> selinux/v2refpolicy/amd64 |
| 11 |
> selinux/v2refpolicy/amd64/no-multilib |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> The /desktop /developer /server would not be deprecated, but present |
| 14 |
> silently as they are for hardened/linux/amd64. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
No. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Beneith is the current "inheritance" of the profile (using the "parent" |
| 19 |
file and using the same order as presented in the file). |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
selinux/v2refpolicy/amd64/hardened |
| 22 |
`- selinux/v2refpolicy/amd64 |
| 23 |
+- default/linux/amd64 |
| 24 |
| +- base |
| 25 |
| +- default/linux |
| 26 |
| '- arch/amd64 |
| 27 |
`- selinux/v2refpolicy |
| 28 |
`- selinux |
| 29 |
`- base |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
"base" and "selinux" both have use.mask on "multilib". So one would |
| 32 |
imagine that the current profile does /not/ allow multilib (you are |
| 33 |
not allowed to set the "multilib" USE flag). There's no profile that |
| 34 |
has a use.force on multilib. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Or I could be completely wrong in this small analysis. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
I'm no profile/portage wizard though. Anyone up to the challenge? |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
Wkr, |
| 41 |
Sven Vermeulen |
Archives