Archives
Archives
| From: | "Petteri Räty" <petteri.raty@××××××××××.fi> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-hardened@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] PAX: suspicious general protection fault | ||
| Date: | Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:51:37 | ||
| Message-Id: | 47543309.2000407@saunalahti.fi | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] PAX: suspicious general protection fault by pageexec@freemail.hu | ||
| 1 | pageexec@××××××××.hu kirjoitti: |
| 2 | > On 3 Dec 2007 at 18:07, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | >> Should this be reported somewhere or? |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > yes, this is a good place to start ;-). i'll need your System.map |
| 7 | > corresponding to this kernel or a decoded oops to see what functions |
| 8 | > were involved. also next time you could enable frame pointers and |
| 9 | > KALLSYMS to get a better trace. you could also try a newer kernel |
| 10 | > (if it's reproducible) as .22 isn't supported for PaX anymore. |
| 11 | > |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Well I go with whatever is marked stable and atm it's .22. Will send the |
| 14 | System.map in private. |
| 15 | |
| 16 | Regards, |
| 17 | Petteri |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-hardened] PAX: suspicious general protection fault | pageexec@××××××××.hu |
| Re: [gentoo-hardened] PAX: suspicious general protection fault | Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |