Archives
Archives
| From: | Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-hardened@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] Re: hardened clang | ||
| Date: | Tue, 23 Dec 2014 20:08:11 | ||
| Message-Id: | 5499CB8E.6020203@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-hardened] Re: hardened clang by wabenbau@gmail.com | ||
| 1 | On 12/23/2014 02:30 PM, wabenbau@×××××.com wrote: |
| 2 | >> |
| 3 | >> are there any future plans for hardened clang? |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > Is my question too unspecific or just too stupid for an answer? ;-) |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Probably just that we don't want to send 100 "no" replies to the mailing |
| 9 | list. You're stuck waiting for a "yes" instead. If you wait long enough |
| 10 | without a "yes," that's a "no" =) |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-hardened] Re: hardened clang | wabenbau@×××××.com |