| 1 |
But is it not default for the SELinux-profile? |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
At least my system says by default: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
$ emerge --info | grep loadpol |
| 6 |
FEATURES="distcc distlocks loadpolicy parallel-fetch sandbox selinux |
| 7 |
sesandbox sfperms strict test" |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
But this seems to be dependent-based, at least if you look at |
| 10 |
apache-2.2.4 it has |
| 11 |
selinux? ( sec-policy/selinux-apache ) |
| 12 |
in its DEPEND. |
| 13 |
So is this faults in DEPEND that I should file bugs for @ b.g.o or is |
| 14 |
there some reason why some things like mdadm has a policy-package but |
| 15 |
does not depend on it in selinux? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
//Peter |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
tor 2007-04-26 klockan 16:14 -0400 skrev Nate Seif: |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> I believe setting FEATURES="loadpolicy" in your /etc/make.conf file should |
| 22 |
> cause Gentoo to merge appropriate SELinux policies with the software they |
| 23 |
> pertain to. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Nate |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote: |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> > I am using SELinux on one of my boxes and one thing that pussels me is |
| 31 |
> > that some "sec-policy/selinux-*" seems not to be merged even when I have |
| 32 |
> > the package they seems to be made for merged. |
| 33 |
> > Example: sec-policy/selinux-mdadm sec-policy/selinux-nfs are both |
| 34 |
> > packages, but are they not required by mdadm and nfs-utils or are they |
| 35 |
> > made for special cases? Also there is selinux-acpi, but I have acpid |
| 36 |
> > merged. Or is it just errors in the deps, things that should be filed |
| 37 |
> > one |
| 38 |
> > by one @ b.g.o? |
| 39 |
> > |
| 40 |
> > Greets |
| 41 |
> > //Peter |
| 42 |
> > |
Archives