| 1 |
El 27/01/10 05:53, pageexec@××××××××.hu escribió: |
| 2 |
> while i haven't looked at the non-PIC in vbox, i can tell you that it's |
| 3 |
> only the tip of the iceberg, there're much more difficult problems there. |
| 4 |
> in particular, the kernel drivers are not compatible with PaX currently |
| 5 |
> and fixing them is anything but trivial (see http://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/941 |
| 6 |
> and their in-house ring-0 module loader code among others). |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Thanks for your reply. I haven't looked for PaX issues yet (I suppose |
| 10 |
it'd be at runtime), I'd like to achieve firstly a successful |
| 11 |
compilation using PIC. I've played a little with the inline asm code and |
| 12 |
I think it can be done. Did you tested those PaX issues using a provided |
| 13 |
binary or you compiled from source code? Can you tell if the binary you |
| 14 |
tested had PIC enabled? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
regards, |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Dariem |
Archives