| 1 |
> same again, with CFLAGS="-fno-stack-protector-all -fno-stack-protector |
| 2 |
> -fno-pie -g -ggdb -fno-omit-frame-pointer" FEATURES="nostrip" as |
| 3 |
> suggested: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
i guess that's because the sigsegv occurs in glibc or ld.so, so you'd |
| 6 |
have to emerge glibc again without stripping it (which is a good idea |
| 7 |
anyway when you have to troubleshoot a system). |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> warning: exec file is newer than core file. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
looks like this core file was generated previously, so that can also |
| 12 |
contribute for gdb not matching the addresses, try again with ulimit |
| 13 |
-c unlimited. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> (gdb) x/8i $pc |
| 16 |
> 0x40014dce: Cannot access memory at address 0x40014dce |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
hmm, did you run cpufreqd from within gdb as i suggested? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |
Archives