1 |
Brad, |
2 |
|
3 |
Thanks for responding your blessing was the one I wanted to see the most |
4 |
before jumping into this. We got a fair amount of feedback from various |
5 |
people using both grsec1 & grsec2 and everybody was for a pure grsec |
6 |
only kernel. |
7 |
|
8 |
To meet the needs of everybody my initial plan will be to add both |
9 |
2.4.21.1.9.11 and 2.4.21.2.0_rc2 unless you have an _rc3 planned for 2.0 |
10 |
in the next few days and then removing 1.9 when you deem 2.0 as stable. |
11 |
|
12 |
Supported arches will be x86, sparc, sparc64, alpha, parisc, and ppc |
13 |
|
14 |
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 13:21, spender@××××××××××.net wrote: |
15 |
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 06:48:36PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote: |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > Gentoo Linux includes support for grsecurity in nearly every kernel that |
18 |
> > we have. Unfortunately the patch level is not always as up2date as Brad's |
19 |
> > code due to the many other patches that are included, however what I'm |
20 |
> > wondering here is do the Gentoo users want the option of merging a |
21 |
> > vanilla-kernel with just "one" patch applied. It would be called |
22 |
> > grsecurity-sources. I would like to use the grsec2 series for this so we |
23 |
> > can help Brad debug and get it to a stable level. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> I would definitely like this. I could give them official stampings |
26 |
> then. This weekend I might throw some packages of current cvs of grsec |
27 |
> and gradm up on the website. I'd like to get a group of people together |
28 |
> so that for every release I can offer some packages in different formats |
29 |
> of grsecurity and gradm. I'd also like to have a package that would |
30 |
> work on most ide-based servers that wouldn't have module support and |
31 |
> thus would have KERNEXEC enabled. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> -Brad |
34 |
-- |
35 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
36 |
Gentoo Linux Developer (Hardened) |
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |