Re: [gentoo-hardened] paxtest

[Matt Poletiek]

What about the hardened and pic USE flags in the hardened profile? Are
those still of use?

Also, is there a way to test ssp functionality against return to
function (memcpy and strcpy) ?

On 10/23/07, Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 16:55 -0600, Matt Poletiek wrote:
> > So if im reading the docs correctly do I need -fstack-protector-all
> > and -fstack-protector in my CFLAGS to take advantage of ssp?
> >
> > According to the docs it should be default in the hardened profile? I
> > just need the hardened and pic USE flags right?
>
> Correct. no need to muck with CFLAGS at all.
> CFLAGS="-O2 -pipe" go...
>
> >
> > On 10/23/07, pageexec@××××××××.hu <pageexec@××××××××.hu> wrote:
> > > On 23 Oct 2007 at 21:03, Javier Martínez wrote:
> > >
> > > > 2007/10/23, Matt Poletiek <chill550@×××××.com>:
> > > > > Any idea why when I add -fstack-protector-all and -fstack-protector to
> > > > > CFLAGS paxtest still compiles with  -fno-stack-protector
> > > > > -fno-stack-protector-all ?
> > > > >
> > > > I think ssp is disabled in the Makefile. Look at there. Please take
> > > > note that (in my opinion) paxtest should only demonstrate how pax
> > > > works, not how ssp does.
> > >
> > > correct, ssp is disabled on purpose.
> > >
> > > --
> > > gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthew Poletiek
> > www.chill-fu.net
> --
> Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
> Gentoo Linux
>
> --
> gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list
>
>


-- 
Matthew Poletiek
www.chill-fu.net
-- 
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list