1 |
On Tuesday 09 August 2005 01:14, pageexec@××××××××.hu wrote: |
2 |
> On 8 Aug 2005 at 17:23, Pedro Venda wrote: |
3 |
> > I've written a small document describing a simple benchmark of the PaX |
4 |
> > memory protections overhead on different x86 CPUs. There is a theoretical |
5 |
> > section where I try to explain what do PAGEEXEC and SEGMEXEC actually do, |
6 |
> > there is the benchmark itself and some notes on the results. |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > http://arrakis.dhis.org/linux/doc/pax-performance/ |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > Hoping to get back some comments but mostly wrong or misleading data |
11 |
> > reports. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> first of all, a big thank you for doing this work, it was badly |
14 |
> missing from the PaX docs. below i'll comment on a few things: |
15 |
|
16 |
hi, |
17 |
|
18 |
thanks for your comments. they assume a bigger meaning being you who part (or |
19 |
all) of the PaX development team and documentation. |
20 |
|
21 |
I'll dig in your comments in the following days and make the necessary |
22 |
improvements, after which I'll say something here. |
23 |
|
24 |
kind regards, |
25 |
pedro venda. |
26 |
-- |
27 |
|
28 |
Pedro João Lopes Venda |
29 |
email: pjvenda < at > arrakis.dhis.org |
30 |
http://arrakis.dhis.org |