| 1 |
> I'd rather use the gentoo_ prefix for those things that we *know* are not |
| 2 |
> to |
| 3 |
> be merged upstream anytime soon and which are /Gentoo/ specific (like some |
| 4 |
> of our booleans). |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Any objections here? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
It seemed like a good idea at the time. Sounds like it has created more |
| 9 |
problems than it solved? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
My main concern (which prompted the current scheme) was that I didn't want |
| 12 |
us creating collisions with upstream policy. It sounds like what you are |
| 13 |
saying is that there are already enough issues with applying upstream |
| 14 |
policy that our current scheme isn't really saving us anything. That |
| 15 |
being the case, I think I am OK with dropping the prefix. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Later, |
| 18 |
Gizmo |
Archives