Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From: pageexec@××××××××.hu
To: Andrea Zuccherelli <andrea.zuccherelli@×××××.com>
Cc: aufs-users@×××××××××××××××××.net, gentoo-hardened@l.g.o, re.emese@×××××.com
Subject: [gentoo-hardened] Re: aufs3.0 fails to emerge on Gentoo hardened and kernel 3.0.4
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 19:58:02
Message-Id: 4F035DA3.26816.A78DE2F@pageexec.freemail.hu
1 On 3 Jan 2012 at 20:47, Andrea Zuccherelli wrote:
2
3 please don't top post, it makes your responses hard to correlate to what
4 you're referring to. like right here:
5
6 > Ok, but this does not solve the gcc switch bug... ;)
7
8 what does 'this' refer to'? if you meant CONFIG_PAX_CONSTIFY_PLUGIN then
9 there should be no gcc switch bug.
10
11 > Either I will have to wait for next hardened-gentoo kernel release and
12 > aufs3 ebuild mantainer to turn off constification,
13
14 the kernel .config is under your control, not theirs, so you can disable
15 it any time.
16
17 > a no_const patch for fsnotify_backend.c or a wise (how?) use of fsnotify struct by
18 > Okajima.
19
20 i think arekm's patch is fine, probably even better than what gentoo includes
21 now, so feel free to push it into gentoo as well.
22
23 > In any case developer work when if this switch would work it woud not be needed.
24 >
25 > PS: for the no_const patch found this for aufs3 on PLD Linux:
26 > http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/cvs/packages/kernel/kernel-aufs2-no-const-grsec.patch?revision=1.6&view=markup