1 |
2011.Április 17.(V) 13:20 időpontban Magnus Granberg ezt írta: |
2 |
> söndag 17 april 2011 12.27.19 skrev Tóth Attila: |
3 |
>> 2011.Április 17.(V) 03:49 időpontban Alex Efros ezt írta: |
4 |
>> > Hi! |
5 |
>> > |
6 |
>> > On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 02:17:21AM +0200, "Tóth Attila" wrote: |
7 |
>> >> Reverting to the old binary makes the problem go away. |
8 |
>> > |
9 |
>> > Any chance it's as trivial as somehow modified old binary - like with |
10 |
>> > paxctl? |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> paxctl -m haven't solved the problem. |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> > Also, you can try to use non-hardened gcc to build apache, just in |
15 |
>> case. |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> I would rather not use a non-hardened apache on the server. But I can |
18 |
>> give |
19 |
>> a try to compile it using a vanilla gcc profile. |
20 |
>> Any of you successfully recompiled apache with a recent toolchain and |
21 |
>> see |
22 |
>> the ssl connections are working correctly? |
23 |
>> |
24 |
>> Thx: |
25 |
>> Dw. |
26 |
>> |
27 |
>> > -- |
28 |
>> > |
29 |
>> > WBR, Alex. |
30 |
> Look at bug http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363443 |
31 |
> /Magnus |
32 |
|
33 |
Compiling using gcc-4.5.2 with -O1 or switching to gcc-4.4.5 solves the |
34 |
issue. Obviously it's not a solution. |
35 |
I can provide binaries, but gcc cannot compile using -g ggdb in my case. |
36 |
|
37 |
Thx for the tip. I add my comment to this bug. |
38 |
|
39 |
Dw. |
40 |
-- |
41 |
dr Tóth Attila, Radiológus, 06-20-825-8057 |
42 |
Attila Toth MD, Radiologist, +36-20-825-8057 |