1 |
Hi all, |
2 |
|
3 |
There is a nice debate ongoing on the mailinglist [1] on the topic of |
4 |
grsecurity's recent decision to no longer provide the test patches to the |
5 |
public. I'd like to keep the debate on the rationale of it in that |
6 |
discussion, but focus here on what we, from Gentoo Hardened, now need to do |
7 |
or which direction we're going to move forward with. |
8 |
|
9 |
[1] |
10 |
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-hardened/message/a06145056b167f52c079bffd9c9a51ac |
11 |
|
12 |
The obvious step is indeed to stop further *current* development on |
13 |
hardened-sources. I don't know how many additional patchsets are being |
14 |
implemented in it (blueness? Zorry?) so I don't know if it means that |
15 |
hardened-sources in total is done with or not. |
16 |
|
17 |
From the online discussions I also hear that we shouldn't be referring to |
18 |
grsecurity anymore (even when it was still the test patches). This means |
19 |
that we need to update our wiki articles, as well as include a note that the |
20 |
document is only valid until a certain time (I don't want to remove them, |
21 |
for those users that still have older versions running and want to find the |
22 |
documentation on it). |
23 |
|
24 |
Now, I mentioned *current* development. Are there other improvements that we |
25 |
can look at which make sense to put into hardened-sources, and are there |
26 |
volunteers to help out with it? |
27 |
|
28 |
Wkr, |
29 |
Sven Vermeulen |