| 1 |
understood, better yet, I'll ask blueness probably how does he wants the patches. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
thanks for the explanation. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2014 at 9:33 AM |
| 6 |
> From: "Tóth Attila" <atoth@××××××××××.hu> |
| 7 |
> To: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o |
| 8 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] [PATCH] fix sys-process/cronie compilation under gentoo+musl |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Musl is ment to be an alternative to libc. Some of the hardened folks |
| 11 |
> (perverts ;->) are interested to make it work on Hardened Gentoo. But musl |
| 12 |
> itself is not necessary hardened per se. You've linked the Hardened |
| 13 |
> project subpage. The package maintainer happens to be a hardened developer |
| 14 |
> (blueness). So your message probably reaches him. But it's not the optimal |
| 15 |
> channel. So what pageexec tried to advise, is to open a bug in the gentoo |
| 16 |
> bug tracking system and attach your patches and diffs to the bug. But I |
| 17 |
> still suggest to attach a single diff per file. And don't try to use diff |
| 18 |
> as a version control system. Specify sys-libs/musl in the title and the |
| 19 |
> description and it will reach the maintainer of the package, will probably |
| 20 |
> got assigned to him. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Regards: |
| 25 |
> Dw. |
| 26 |
> -- |
| 27 |
> dr Tóth Attila, Radiológus, 06-20-825-8057 |
| 28 |
> Attila Toth MD, Radiologist, +36-20-825-8057 |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> 2014.November 15.(Szo) 06:25 időpontban daggs ezt írta: |
| 31 |
> > Greetings, |
| 32 |
> > |
| 33 |
> >> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 at 11:52 PM |
| 34 |
> >> From: "PaX Team" <pageexec@××××××××.hu> |
| 35 |
> >> To: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o |
| 36 |
> >> Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] [PATCH] fix sys-process/cronie |
| 37 |
> >> compilation under gentoo+musl |
| 38 |
> >> |
| 39 |
> >> On 14 Nov 2014 at 22:05, "Tóth Attila" wrote: |
| 40 |
> >> |
| 41 |
> >> > I would suggest to attach the responsible patch of the missing define |
| 42 |
> >> only |
| 43 |
> >> > and the necessary diff of a given ebuild file. That two files could be |
| 44 |
> >> > enough, I guess. |
| 45 |
> >> |
| 46 |
> >> yes and probably choose a better list and/or open a bugzilla entry as i |
| 47 |
> >> doubt |
| 48 |
> >> this is hardened related at all ;). |
| 49 |
> >> |
| 50 |
> >> |
| 51 |
> >> |
| 52 |
> > not sure I understand the latter, this is a issue that is caused by |
| 53 |
> > running gentoo atop of musl, according to this wiki page, |
| 54 |
> > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Hardened_musl I should send the |
| 55 |
> > patches to this list. |
| 56 |
> > |
| 57 |
> > am I wrong? |
| 58 |
> > |
| 59 |
> > |
| 60 |
> |
| 61 |
> |
| 62 |
> |
| 63 |
> |
Archives