Archives
Archives
| From: | RB <aoz.syn@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-hardened@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] hardened-sources-3.2.11 + i965 + x.org: possible regression | ||
| Date: | Fri, 18 May 2012 21:02:41 | ||
| Message-Id: | CADkMHCmyZ+SYEjhSpZbffArSdwkZODqCC+jVhyD9VZsp7zJy3g@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] hardened-sources-3.2.11 + i965 + x.org: possible regression by Hinnerk van Bruinehsen |
||
| 1 | On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 2:11 AM, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen |
| 2 | <h.v.bruinehsen@×××××××××.de> wrote: |
| 3 | > For me X works fine with UDEREF enabled. I'm using xorg-server-1.12.1 |
| 4 | > and xf86-video-intel-2.19.0. (2 laptops, 1 core2 duo, 1 first |
| 5 | > generation i5, if that has got something to do with it) |
| 6 | |
| 7 | That's because (as I just found by testing) PAX_KERNEXEC "mitigates" |
| 8 | the oops. To put it in something of a boolean form, the following |
| 9 | produces the crashes: |
| 10 | |
| 11 | PAX_MEMORY_UDEREF && !(PAX_MEMORY_UDEREF && PAX_KERNEXEC) |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-hardened] hardened-sources-3.2.11 + i965 + x.org: possible regression | PaX Team <pageexec@××××××××.hu> |