Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From:	Kyle Bader <kyle.bader@×××××.com>
To:	gentoo-hardened@l.g.o
Subject:	Re: [gentoo-hardened] binary protection mechanisms in different Linux distros
Date:	Thu, 01 Jul 2010 21:10:23
Message-Id:	`AANLkTikwNsiEM27SnoijGmUjxO-Kj246FHqtmfAc4SS9@mail.gmail.com`
In Reply to:	Re: [gentoo-hardened] binary protection mechanisms in different Linux distros by Kyle Bader

1	On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Kyle Bader <kyle.bader@×××××.com> wrote:
2	>> Javier: good point, I haven't really considered the differences between the
3	>> use of fstack-protector and fstack-protector-all - maybe something to do in
4	>> the future. Would there be a way to find out which option was used on a given
5	>> binary 'post mortem'? (read: after compilation? ;))
6
7	Which was mentioned in TFA, my bad.
8
9	--
10
11	Kyle

Subject	Author
Re: [gentoo-hardened] binary protection mechanisms in different Linux distros	Radoslaw Madej <radegand@××.pl>