Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From:	pageexec@××××××××.hu
To:	gentoo-hardened@l.g.o
Subject:	Re: [gentoo-hardened] SSP + setjmp() = badness?
Date:	Sun, 30 Jul 2006 09:59:23
Message-Id:	`44CC9E7E.243.40D3DECA@pageexec.freemail.hu`
In Reply to:	[gentoo-hardened] SSP + setjmp() = badness? by Richard Hansen

1	On 29 Jul 2006 at 17:37, Richard Hansen wrote:
2	> After spending hours with gdb, I believe I have narrowed down the
3	> problem to a setjmp() call in the Wireshark code. That call seems to
4	> be trashing the stack, based on comparing local variable values before
5	> and after the call. Is this a known limitation of SSP, or should
6	> setjmp() work with SSP?
7
8	the bug tracking SSP code generation issues is 135265. given that
9	noone seems to be able and willing to fix them, you'll probably
10	have to live without SSP in c++ code.
11
12	--
13	gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list