| 1 |
On Thursday 29 January 2004 15:07, Eric Sammer wrote: |
| 2 |
> Kurt Lieber wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Figure out where you want the directory and I'll be happy to create it. |
| 4 |
> > Looking at our various top level categories, it doesn't really fit |
| 5 |
> > cleanly into any of them. I'd suggest base as being the closest match. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> This is sticky. I don't have an opinion either way about it as long as |
| 8 |
> it's not branded a desktop or server subproject so as to alienate either |
| 9 |
> group. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
It probably fits best within the tools toplevel. However the tools toplevel is |
| 13 |
not really active at the moment. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> > This is something I would object to. If this is an official Gentoo |
| 16 |
> > project (which I assume it is) that we're going to let official Gentoo |
| 17 |
> > users eventually user (which I assume we are) then we need to ensure that |
| 18 |
> > it's developed on secure infrastructure, etc. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Not a problem. That's why I threw that out as something to discuss. I |
| 21 |
> wasn't sure what our policies were on things such as this. Right now, I |
| 22 |
> think all those that would be writing code (and therefore need CVS |
| 23 |
> commit access) are Gentoo devs (or soon to be). |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I agree with Kurt here. I don't think it should be a big problem. Things can |
| 26 |
be committed by others if needed. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Paul |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 32 |
Researcher |
| 33 |
Mail: pauldv@××××××.nl |
| 34 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives