| 1 |
Honestly Michael I'm not bickering my request is valid, the installer cd |
| 2 |
cannot be reproduced this makes it a proprietary product, its closed. You |
| 3 |
might not have the need to modify the cd in anyway or reproduce it in |
| 4 |
another fasion, but I do and I dont mean just any livecd. My requirement was |
| 5 |
for it to be as close to the installer cd as possible. So you were right the |
| 6 |
first time, why cant the spec files along with the patch of Catalyst be |
| 7 |
released or atleast be put into cvs access for non-end user access? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
On 10/20/05, Michael Crute <mcrute@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> On 10/20/05, Mike Rosset <schizoid29@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > mkisofs is really not hard to do Andrew I can do that, I have |
| 14 |
> > requirements that need to emulate the installer cd. If I just needed to make |
| 15 |
> > a custum cd catalyst is fine or the good old fasion way works too. The point |
| 16 |
> > is your installer cd is useless since it cannot be reproduced this makes it |
| 17 |
> > proprietary, thats not to say it doesnt work as intended. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Perhaps we should start another thread to bicker about this, or do as |
| 21 |
> Chris says and move it to the releng list. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> -Mike |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> -- |
| 26 |
> ________________________________ |
| 27 |
> Michael E. Crute |
| 28 |
> Software Developer |
| 29 |
> SoftGroup Development Corporation |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Linux, because reboots are for installing hardware. |
| 32 |
> "In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?" |
| 33 |
> |
Archives