1 |
Jesse McNelis wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>On 9/20/05, Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> |
6 |
>>On Tuesday 20 September 2005 03:32, Zac Medico wrote: |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>>>Paul J. Wilson wrote: |
10 |
>>> |
11 |
>>> |
12 |
>>>>Regular, everyday users tend not to have the time to spend on the |
13 |
>>>>finer points of linux and gentoo in particular. |
14 |
>>>> |
15 |
>>>> |
16 |
>>>These "everyday users" are unqualified to administrate a Gentoo box for |
17 |
>>>various reasons including the inherent complexity of a source based |
18 |
>>>distribution. A binary distribution with lots of "hand holding" would |
19 |
>>>better suit their needs. Perhaps they could even use a binary |
20 |
>>>distribution of Gentoo itself, but supported by some other entity. |
21 |
>>> |
22 |
>>>Sure, an "everyday user" can *use* Gentoo, but administration is best |
23 |
>>>left to experts. That's all IMO, of course. ;) |
24 |
>>> |
25 |
>>> |
26 |
>>I think this indeed sums it up well. Gentoo is not aimed at users who do |
27 |
>>not want (or are not capable) to learn some more complex parts of the |
28 |
>>unix/linux operating system. That does not mean it's insuitable for |
29 |
>>newbees, it means that they have a steep learning curve ahead. Gentoo is |
30 |
>>not the most easy distribution around, and this is not the aim of gentoo. |
31 |
>>Gentoo is, like any other distro, not a 20 legged spider. It is a source |
32 |
>>based distribution with the goal of offering an uptodate, flexible, |
33 |
>>vanilla system. |
34 |
>> |
35 |
>>Paul |
36 |
>> |
37 |
>>-- |
38 |
>>Paul de Vrieze |
39 |
>>Gentoo Developer |
40 |
>>Mail: pauldv@g.o |
41 |
>>Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
42 |
>> |
43 |
>> |
44 |
>> |
45 |
>> |
46 |
>> |
47 |
> |
48 |
>I've always wondered at the definition of "easy to use". |
49 |
>does "easy to use" mean that you can pick it up and be productive in |
50 |
>an afternoon? |
51 |
>or does "easy to use" mean that once you have put in the hard yards to |
52 |
>learn it, it is extremely easy to do everyday tasks and just as easy |
53 |
>to do complex ones? |
54 |
> |
55 |
>- Jesse McNelis |
56 |
> |
57 |
> |
58 |
> |
59 |
> |
60 |
Hi all, |
61 |
|
62 |
I deeply think the topic here has become more about the way users |
63 |
(newbies and devs) are apprehending their interaction (which for obvious |
64 |
reasons are very contradictive) with their computers rather than a real |
65 |
installer development subject. Not that this is a bad thing, but the |
66 |
conception of Human Computer Interaction (HCI |
67 |
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human-computer_interaction>) from each |
68 |
"side" (newbies and devs) is IMO much more complex than what it may look |
69 |
like. It is much more about design and cognitive science rather than |
70 |
just general statements like "gentoo is not for this type of users or |
71 |
that type": Gentoo is free and for everyone. |
72 |
Indeed, it is up to the devs to estimate, conceive and design an |
73 |
interface (GUI or CLI) and new users (newbies) have their place in the |
74 |
testing phaze which takes place far after conception (eventhough some |
75 |
theories ship the newby directly during early design). The idea here is |
76 |
that designing (not coding) an installer which is like a "gate" that |
77 |
allow "true and understood" communication between newbies and devs |
78 |
during the install process is almost the HARDEST part of that project, |
79 |
here again IMO. |
80 |
|
81 |
My point is: if some newbies would like to defend the idea of a quiz or |
82 |
whatsoever, could that be possible to post it on forums.gentoo.org |
83 |
rather than to this mailing list? We would have much more people reading |
84 |
and commenting and more HCI experts to help the devs out if they need |
85 |
to. Because now I think the reflexion here is more guided by intuitive |
86 |
conceptions rather than theories, which is not bad but not the best way... |
87 |
|
88 |
Thanx, |
89 |
Erick |
90 |
-- |
91 |
gentoo-installer@g.o mailing list |