Archives
Archives
| From: | Nathaniel McCallum <npmccallum@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-installer@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-installer] New class diagram and use case | ||
| Date: | Tue, 03 Feb 2004 22:16:54 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1075846608.12132.10.camel@luther.natemccallum.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-installer] New class diagram and use case by Paul de Vrieze |
||
| 1 | On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 17:03, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 2 | > I find an after-the-fact interference idea to be quite unnatural. Another |
| 3 | > option would be to feed the backend two xml files which basically have null |
| 4 | > actions such that they complement eachoter. Such a solution however would be |
| 5 | > suboptimal to me |
| 6 | |
| 7 | I don't understand why this is unnatural. Could you develop a case |
| 8 | scenario what would warrant the pausing? Personally, I would prefer |
| 9 | hooks for user defined scripts (between stages). |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Nathaniel |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-installer] New class diagram and use case | Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-installer] New class diagram and use case | Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o> |