| 1 |
Hi all, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
I've noticed Java 6u2 has just been released. AFAIK, bug 6507179 |
| 4 |
(http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6507179) was keeping Java 6 masked on Gentoo - |
| 5 |
it has been fixed in this release. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Does this help in terms of getting Java 6 stable? Or am I way out of date? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Ciao, |
| 10 |
Craig |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Alistair Bush wrote: |
| 14 |
> what an absolute bugger!! I wish java would let us win at least one |
| 15 |
> battle. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> On 1/21/07, *Petteri Räty* <betelgeuse@g.o |
| 18 |
> <mailto:betelgeuse@g.o>> wrote: |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158720 |
| 21 |
> <https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158720> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> So some packages fail to build javadocs with >=sun-jdk-1.6. As everyone |
| 24 |
> did not seem to be aware on how to handled this the right DEPEND |
| 25 |
> atom is: |
| 26 |
> doc? ( || ( =virtual/jdk-1.4* = virtual/jdk-1.5* ) ) |
| 27 |
> !doc? ( >=virtual/jdk-1.4 ) |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> RDEPEND: |
| 30 |
> >=virtual/jre-1.4 |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> Regards, |
| 33 |
> Petteri |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> PS. If someone was wondering, this bug prevents sun-jdk-1.6 going stable |
| 36 |
> until all packages have been tested to build javadocs with it. |
| 37 |
> -- |
| 38 |
> gentoo-java@g.o <mailto:gentoo-java@g.o> mailing list |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
-- |
| 43 |
gentoo-java@g.o mailing list |
Archives