| 1 |
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 22:35 +1300, Alistair Bush wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Seeing that only me and fordfrog turned up to the meeting :P I would |
| 4 |
>> like to summarize and discuss some of the issues that were planned. |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> 1) Potential Recruits: |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> Basically I am getting completely sick and tired of the good work that |
| 9 |
>> Elvanor is doing and therefore strongly think that he should be offered |
| 10 |
>> the carrot of temptation/corruption. |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> I am happy to be his Sith Lord, if non of the other devs that are up the |
| 13 |
>> queue (Caster?, wltjr?, fordfrog) have the time required. |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> I would very much like to see this topic title changed to New Recruit |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> Does anyone have any concerns/issues they want to raise about this? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> I have no problem. I briefly brought it an up believe Petteri has some |
| 20 |
> QA and lack of knowledge issues, and etc. So we just likely need get |
| 21 |
> Elvanor started in the quiz process. Fill in the gaps in knowledge or |
| 22 |
> etc during that process. In his defense I made a comment about people |
| 23 |
> like me specifically still asking the obvious or things I should know |
| 24 |
> already at times. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> So willingness, responsibility, etc I think should have greater weight |
| 27 |
> than just technical proficiency. Not that proficiency should be |
| 28 |
> overlooked or ignored. But that can come in time :) Or not as in my |
| 29 |
> case ;) |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Your not the only one |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
If technical proficiency was the only criteria, I would have been forced |
| 35 |
to hang up my hat in the first week of devship ( Does anyone remember my |
| 36 |
first week? :| ) ( Has anyone noticed how I'm hacking out java-config? ) |
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-java@g.o mailing list |
Archives